Smart TVs are essentially regular TVs that have built-in capabilities for connecting to the Internet, which is why they’re also known as Internet-ready TVs. While this feature can be useful, the real question is whether or not these TVs are worth the price for what they bring.
And if we’re being honest, the answer is a clear No.
Not to say that smart TVs are absolutely horrible, because they certainly have a
number of benefits that can make life easier for the average user. However, it’s undeniable that smart TVs are now obsolete, and at this time, the choice to buy a smart TV would not be a smart thing to do.
1. The Security Risks Are Real
And
smart TVs have been one of the worst offenders over the past few years. In short, smart TVs can put your privacy and security at risk in a handful of ways, but the most damning example is that smart TV cameras could be used to spy on innocent people.
Well, smart TVs aren’t immune to this.
Other
security risks also exist, such as malware and inherent weaknesses in the underlying firmware. We aren’t saying that all smart TV users will inevitably be hacked; rather, these risks are real. And while there are
steps you can take to stay safe, they can be somewhat inconvenient.
2. Great Idea, Terrible Execution
If there’s one reason that should dissuade you from buying a smart TV today, let it be this one: the ideas behind the smart TV are great, but
smart TVs themselves are not the right way to implement those ideas. Given a few more years, smart TV technology will be completely obsolete.
Perhaps the greatest idea driving smart TV technology is the idea that
various media “channels” can be streamed on demand over the Internet and directly to your TV. We’re talking about services like Netflix, Hulu, Pandora, and Spotify, which aren’t available through traditional network and cable TV channels.
Yet while this idea is revolutionary, smart TVs have fallen short in idea execution. Primitive TV interfaces and lackluster apps are two big reasons behind the execution failure — and we’ll explore both of those failings down below — but they aren’t the key issue.
Consider this: your smartphone can do everything that a smart TV can do. Using a Chromecast, for example, you can watch almost any kind of streamed media on your smartphone and “cast” it onto your TV, even if that TV isn’t a smart TV.
At the end of the day, a TV should have one purpose: displaying images to the screen. It shouldn’t concern itself with what it can display, as that should be determined by what you plug into the TV. (In other words, a TV should be a glorified monitor and nothing more.)
3. Smart TVs Lack Smart Interfaces
Smart functionality requires a smart interface. Smartphones and computers are great because they both support two important input methods: 1) typing and 2) pointing. Smart TVs are terrible at both, and this leads to a lot of frustration for users.
Or in other words, if you want to sit down and watch something on a smart TV, it’s actually a lot more work than you’d expect it to be. Not an impossible amount, but inconvenient at best.
One big example of this is when you want to search for a particular TV show or movie in an app like Netflix or Hulu. With a regular TV remote, typing is a hair-pulling affair that could take up to a dozen button presses per letter typed. I deal with this every day, and it never gets easier.
On the other hand, most streaming set-top boxes come with remotes that have voice-controlled searches or mobile apps that let you type out your searches with a smartphone or tablet. Much, much easier.
Smart TVs could solve this issue by implementing their own voice-controlled searches (still imperfect), or allowing for third-party keyboard attachments (not ideal), or switching to touchscreen keyboard input (more expensive). I’ll stick with my
Roku, thank you very much.
4. TV Apps Are Crude & Unreliable
When smart TVs first debuted, one of their biggest selling points was the ability to download and install all kinds of apps right on the TV itself. Right now, my smart TV is equipped with apps for Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, YouTube, TED Talks, and Spotify. Sounds useful, right?
Unfortunately, not only do all of these apps suffer the same issues that are inherent to TVs in general — namely poor interface design — but they also suffer from poor performance and neglect from app creators.
The processing power of a modern smart TV pales in comparison to the performance of modern smartphones and tablets. As such, it’s not uncommon to experience input lag when pressing buttons, freezes and crashes when apps try to do something intensive, and other performance-related issues.
Case in point, the Netflix app on my smart TV sometimes freezes when I want to exit out of it and the only solution is to wait several minutes or unplug it altogether. It doesn’t happen every day, but it happens often enough that it sticks out clearly in my mind.
Glitches are also regular fare. Whenever I play videos using the YouTube app on my smart TV, playback is always cut short by exactly one minute from the end. Yes, onevery video. Not to mention that this app also experiences frequent freezes and crashes when trying to exit out of it.
These problems are to be expected, I think. Content providers have to juggle compatibility with a lot of potential outlets these days, including web players, smartphone apps, tablet apps, third-party devices like the Roku and Chromecast, and smart TVs. Which one do you think has the lowest priority?
Which brings up another potential issue: the usefulness of your smart TV is limited by the apps that are available for it, and if content providers stop updating their smart TV apps for whatever reason, your smart TV loses a big chunk of what makes it “smart”.
Five to ten years from now, your smart TV might just end up being a dumb TV by no fault of your own. If that happens, you’ll have to rely on
set-top boxes and other streaming methods anyway. Why spend extra on a smart TV when you can just go dumb and spend the money you save on a Roku or Chromecast?
5. The Extra Features Aren’t Worth It
So what do you get when you shell out cash for a smart TV instead of a dumb TV? Well, if you exclude the Internet-capable apps that we discussed above, it turns out you don’t actually get that much.
One central remote. Every additional media device you hook up will likely require an additional remote control to juggle. Using a smart TV prevents that clutter. (A minor point, I know, but worth mentioning.)
Smart media playback. With Samsung, there’s a feature called Smart Link that lets you create a wireless connection and directly stream media files from your PC to your TV. Other brands may offer similar functionality under different names.
Web and games. TV apps are mainly for streaming media, but they can also be used to browse the Internet or play games. However, due to the poor interface and poor performance, you probably won’t be using a smart TV for either of these.
If you ask me, the features don’t justify the price. Now, how much can you stand to save by opting for a dumb TV over a smart TV? Well, let’s look at a middle-of-the-road option that’s currently available.
Obviously $33 isn’t a lot in the grand scheme, but you’d probably be better off saving that much and spending it on a $35 Chromecast or a $45 Roku Streaming Stick. If I could do it over again, that’s exactly what I’d do.
Are You Buying a Smart TV?
We aren’t necessarily trying to persuade you away from smart TVs. Rather, we just want you to know why we think smart TVs are no longer worth their investment (regardless of how small that investment might be in the big picture). If you still want one, more power to you. Go for it!
How do you feel about smart TVs now? If you still think they’re worth it, what makes you feel that way? We’d love to hear your thoughts on the matter. Share with us below!